20 Usuário(s) estão lendo este tópico (Nos últimos 30 minutos)
0 membros, 20 convidado(s)
0 membros, 20 convidado(s)
What's popular right now:








AoKTS updates (59 users)

Word Association (29 users)

New CBA Hero now supports HD / D... (21 users)

TIW 2020 Map votes (21 users)

1.6 reward campaing (19 users)

CBA PathBlood 1.8.2 (18 users)

Public Beta - New Voobly Client ... (17 users)
Most active threads in past week:








1.6 georgians not able to upgrad... (5 posts)

Impossible to play - voobly keep... (5 posts)

XQ NO ME PUEDO UNIR A NINGUNA SALA (4 posts)

1.6 recording ends before game ends (3 posts)

WE CAN'T CHAT IN PRIVATE ON VOOBLY (2 posts)

Problem with chat in GAME (2 posts)

1.6 full random default (2 posts)
What exactly is your problem with a vote?
If you wan't a tournament where you dictate every rule, then i suggest you go host one. A vote is the only fair way to do it here.
dont answer anymore pls bcoz i wont
making live vetos forces everyone to be ready for every situation with really not thinking time, which forces you to be ready before the match set up starts (as i said before)
They also have a limited roster unlike our case, they cannot entirely switch out their players for every other match.
Honestly, the only real reason for you insisting on this can be, that you try to get an advantage by picking weird and unusual civcombinations and not allowing the opponent time to create a gameplan. And you talk about making it competitive... Trying to get cheap wins?
Oh and i understand the 1hr rule, clans with 100+ members needs time to manage the players and decide who plays what, play few practice game and watch some records if there is time left, fine.
Oh and i understand the 1hr rule, clans with 100+ members needs time to manage the players and decide who plays what, play few practice game and watch some records if there is time left, fine.
That is how RB plans to knock out xCs into the Silver League.