14 Usuário(s) estão lendo este tópico (Nos últimos 30 minutos)
0 membros, 14 convidado(s)
0 membros, 14 convidado(s)
What's popular right now:
1.6 reward campaing (69 users)
AoKTS updates (61 users)
CBA PathBlood 1.8.0 (45 users)
#ReviveCS - Proposal (31 users)
Word Association (26 users)
New CBA Hero now supports HD / D... (19 users)
Setting up port forwarding in ro... (14 users)
Most active threads in past week:
#ReviveCS - Proposal (45 posts)
New CBA Hero now supports HD / D... (8 posts)
my version shows as 1.0C and oth... (7 posts)
1.0c shows in game instead of 1.... (7 posts)
Voobly disappearing without erro... (7 posts)
AYUDA!! LOST CONNECTION TO THE S... (6 posts)
1.6 Out of sync without any play... (4 posts)
Let's go back to the main topic, all maps can be chosen;
Everyone has vetoes to veto maps that they don't like, they need to think, to know what maps to veto, if they don't want to have CBA / Hero in TG Round.
If I choose CBA (Immunity) /CBA Hero, they can veto me CBA hero.
They must think well what maps to veto, so that do not have maps on which did not want to play.
No map should be included without prior discussion.
2
The vote is on whether Zotten and Lustful should be classed the same way as in both cant be picked in the same round.
I don't see any rules for bloods, even though many maps look alike, and have the same gameplay, did I miss something?
can we just use double elimination? it will save so much time and avoid top clans playing two matches vs weaker clan just for points
it will be something like this [You must login to view link]
I made these seeding same how it is now so Dave and Army efforts dont go away, group 1 top brackets and group 2 bottom, the next matches not changing from how it is now.
On another note especially havent just watched a number of ab games in a row in 1v1 i think it would be a good idea just for the 1v1 round that if ab is picked to have it as a bo3. Both sides played and fastest to win picking the decider. I think we may have done in the last one? Thoughts?